Is radiometric dating reliable yahoo define hanging out dating
evidence (pun intended) that the radioactive date is reliable.
Of course, there are many problems with such dating methods, such as parent or which they take as evidence that radiometric dating is giving true ages, since it is .
For dating back to about 35, years, sediment layers are precise.
Sediments include different types of pollen depending upon the season.
Every few years, new geologic time scales are published, providing the latest dates for major time lines.
Older dates may change by a few million years up and down, but younger dates are stable.
Sediment columns giving an unbroken history for more than 25, years have been identified in about 30 locations around the world.If those rocks really have been sitting around on the moon for billions of years, I suspect that the the wide range of physical and chemical processes which occurred over that time period had a much more profound effect on the uncertainty of the age determination. Those who are committed to an ancient age for the earth currently believe that it is 4.This is best illustrated by the radioactive age of a sample of diamonds from Zaire. Obviously, then, the minimum error in that measurement is 1.examines bioscience issues in biodiversity, environment, genomics, Some skeptics believe that all fossils are the same age. Radiometric dating involves the use of isotope series, such as rubidium/strontium .This is best illustrated by the radioactive age of a sample of diamonds To understand the problem, let's start with an example of how radioactive dating works.